I totally agree with your views.It is high time government thinks before making statements like giving jobs and money to family members of deceased person, who travelled to other country for earning money rather than on government duty.I am currently abroad and i am here purely to make money.I cannot expect government to provide my family with compensation in case of my death as it was not the government who sent me abroad.
Kkbhai
[This is what Dictinary.com has to say about fascism
1.system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism
CPM fits more into the above definition or BJP?]
Well, let’s go through them one by one, comparing
[system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator]
WB centralises authority, so does
[stringent socioeconomic controls]
Please note: socioeconomic = social and economic.
In WB you may (or currently, actually may not) have more rules for business and industry owners to follow. But that’s only half the equation. Are unions (the other half of business and industry) as free in
And what are the social controls in place in these two States? Are you more likely to be able to run up against a social or cultural organisation burning cinemas down because they don’t like what’s being shown in
[suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship]
Which State has a freer press? Which State has a media that includes a broader set of opinions? (WB)
Which State has more recently tried to harass journalists and writers (by slapping false charges against them) that exposed uncomfortable truths about it?
[a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism]
Definitely more present in
[You said that Congress is non communal and BJP is communal .
Can you substantiate your point here?]
Congress ideology does not differentiate between Indians on the basis of trivial characteristics like religious identity or language.
Hindutva does differentiate between Indians on the basis of religious identity. In fact Hindutva uses only one of
[can you please elaborate on what you mean by parivar?]
Sangh Parivar.
[Is anybody who speaks up for Hindus becomes part of the 'parivar'.]
No – there are plenty of secular minded people, and Leftists, who speak up for Hindus and who are not a part of the Sangh Parivar. A prime example: Medha Patkar is speaking up for the interests of the mostly Hindu rural MP population that is being displaced by the Narmada Dams. (The Hindutva parties are not speaking up for these particular Hindus.)
Regards